![]() ![]() ![]() Meanwhile, Easy Redmine Essential's TCO stays at 148,700 Euros even after five years.Ĭase with 550 users: Jira Software + Confluence + BitBucket vs. After five years, Jira Jira Software’s (cloud) TCO is 79,200 Euros, and Jira Data Center's TCO is 421,000 Euros. Easy Redmine Essential, on the other hand, remains cost-effective with a TCO of 115,682 Euros after three years. Jira Software’s (cloud) TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) is 52,800 Euros after three years, while Jira Data Center's TCO is a staggering 252,600 Euros. Easy Redmine comes with a first-year cost of 66,080 Euros, while Jira Software’s (cloud) is 67,250 Euros and Jira Data Center (on your server) is 84,200 Euros.Īs time goes on, the difference in cost between the two systems becomes more pronounced. Easy Redmine + Knowledge base 2.0 + GitLabįor next we'll examine the Jira Software with Confluence and BitBucket in comparison to Easy Redmine with Knowledge Base 2.0 and GitLab TCO. In contrast, Easy Redmine Essential's TCO stays low at 71,719 Euros, making it a financially sound option for companies, even at full-stack configuration.Ĭase with 350 users: Jira Software + Confluence + BitBucket vs. Jira Software’s (cloud) TCO reaches 136,915 Euros after five years, while Jira Data Center's TCO is 421,000 Euros. On the other hand, Easy Redmine Essential remains cost-efficient with a TCO of 55,775 Euros after three years. After three years, Jira Jira Software’s (cloud) Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) reaches 91,300 Euros, while Jira Data Center's TCO is significantly higher at 252,600 Euros. The first-year cost of Easy Redmine is 31,860 Euros, while Jira Software (cloud) is 45,650 Euros and Jira Data Center (on your server) is 84,200 Euros.Īs time goes by, the cost discrepancy between the two all-stack systems increases. Let’s have a closer look at Jira Software with Confluence and BitBucket in comparison to Easy Redmine with Knowledge Base 2.0 and GitLab TCO. ![]() Easy Redmine + Knowledge base 2.0 + GitLab Case with 150 users: Jira Software + Confluence + BitBucket vs. For the comparison with Jira Software + Confluence + BitBucket, we use Easy Redmine + Knowledge base 2.0 + GitLab, Easy Redmine’s alternative for the aforementioned knowledge management and code repository.Įasy Redmine has many case solutions depending on the number of users and features you need, in this article we provided the most common cases that ask our clients. On the other hand, we compare it to Easy Redmine, which besides Jira’s features offers a wider variety of project management tools such as Gantt charts, integrated time tracking, resource management, project tree structure, Work Breakdown Structure, and many more. We utilized both Jira Cloud and Data Center for the analysis. Confluence is a web-based enterprise wiki and collaboration platform used to create, organize, and share knowledge and information within teams and organizations, while BitBucket is a code hosting and version control platform. The second version we examined is Jira Software with Confluence and BitBucket, which includes additional collaborative and code management features. The first version we analyzed is the standalone Jira Software, which is a project management tool offering features such as project and issue tracking, Agile boards, and customizable workflows. In the following article, we will show you several cases in which we compare Jira and Easy Redmine’s total costs of ownership in the span of one, three, and five years.įor the purpose of our pricing comparison, we chose to use two different versions of Jira. Should users continue to the Cloud/Atlassian Data Center or simply look for alternatives? Is it still worth continuing with Atlassian? This forces Jira users to accept Atlassian’s preferred licensing models. Atlassian is canceling its Jira Server support. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |